Hukuman Mati Bagi Murtad Perspektif Syekh Ali Jum'ah

Authors

  • M. Sholahuddin Al Ayyubi Ma'had Aly Lirboyo, Kec. Mojoroto, Kabupaten Kediri, Jawa Timur 64117, Indonesia
  • Try Heni Aprilia IAIN Kediri, Jawa Timur, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61570/syariah.v1i1.17

Keywords:

Apostasy, Ali Jumah, Death Penalty

Abstract

The existence of Islam as a religion, clean from all forms of coercion, including embracing religion, is shaken by the concept of fiqh, which punishes death for apostasy. In addition, the law is claimed to be part of the ijma 'ulama. This journal attempts to unravel the death penalty polemic using Shaykh Ali Jumah’s approach. The research model used in this study is based on a qualitative literature review. The results of this study indicate that the death penalty for apostasy is not based on a person's attitude toward choosing to leave Islam. However, other attitudes carry the consequences of death, such as ḥirabah (fighting Muslims) and/or the betrayal of Islam (mufāriq lil jamā'ah). In this case, the claim of ijma deserves to be doubted if one sees a motive for leaving Islam simply because of disbelief. This was because the two procedures were performed by Rasulullah SAW. ever ordered his companions to kill the perpetrators of apostasy, not solely for the motives of kufr. Instead, there is a form of betrayal. In addition, ijma’s claim regarding the consequences of death for apostates is strongly suspected to apply the pattern of saddan li al-dzariah or saddan li al-bab. This is meant to close the door to the opportunity for religion to be harmed by apostates.

References

Weiss, Daniel A. Oedipus in Nottingham: D.H. Lawrence. Seatle: University of Washington Press, 1962.

‘Ali Jum‘ah, Al-Kalim al-Ṭayyib Fatawa Asriyah, (Kairo: Dār al-Salām, 2010), 2/417.

‘Ali Jum’ah, Mutasyādidun; Manhājuhum Wa Munaqāsat Ahamm Qadayahum, (Kairo: Dār al-Muqatam, 2011), 7.

Abdurrahman bin Muhammad bin Sulaiman, Majma’ al-Anhār fī Syarḥ Multaqa al-Abhar, (Beirut: Dār al-Ihya’ al-Turats, tt), 1/687.

Ala’uddīn bin Aḥmad al-Kasanī al-Hanafī, Badai’ Al-Ṣanai‘ Fī Tartib al-Syarai‘, (Beirut: Dār al-Kutb al-Ilmiyyah, 1986M), 7/134.

Abu al-Qāsim al-Husain bin Muhammad ar-Rāghib al-Aṣbihani, al-Mufradāt fī Ghārib al-Qur’an, (Beirut: Dār al-Ma’rifah, tth.), 1/316-317

Abū Bakr ‘Abd al-Razaq al-Ṣan‘ani, al-Musnīf Li ‘Abdurrazaq al-Ṣan‘ani, (Beirut: Maktabah al-Islamīy, tt), 10/165

Abū Dāud Sulaiman ibn Asy’as al-Sijistanī, Sunan Abī Dāwud, (Beirut: Dâr al-Fikr, t.t.), 2308.

Aḥmad bin Yahya al-Balażurī, Futūḥ al-Buldān, (Beirut: Dār Wa Maktabah al-Hilal, 1988 M) 1/46

Aḥmad Musabiq Habibie, Pemikiran Hukum Islam Syaikh ‘Ali Jum’ah, (Tangerang: Pustakapedia, 2020), 72

Ali Bin Abi Bakr Abu Al-Hasan Burhanuddīn, Al-Hidayah Fi Al-Syarh Bidāyah Al-Mubtadī (Beirut: Dār al-Iḥya’ Al-Turaṡ, tt), 2/406.

Al-Imām Abī ‘Abd Allāh Muhammad bin Ismā‘īl bin Ibrāhīm al-Bukhārī al-Ja‘fî, Shahīh al-Bukhāri, (Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, tt.), 2794

Al-Kamāl bin al-Hamām. Fatḥ al-Qadīr. (Beirut: Dār al-fikr,tt)353/5

Wahbah bin Muṣṭafa Zuḥaili. Aṡār al-Ḥarbi.(Beirut: Dār al-fikr 2014 M),126.

‘Ali Jum’ah www.draligomaa.com diakses pada 1 Agustus 2019.

Ibn ‘Ābidīn al-Dimasyqī al-Hanafī, al-Dur al-Mukhtār ‘Ala Rad al-Mukhtār, (Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1992M), 4/41.

Ibn Hazm al-Andalusī al-Ẓahirī, al-Muhala Bi al-Aṡār, (Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, tt), 11/138, lihat juga: Abū Bakr ‘Abd al-Razaq al-Ṣan‘ani,

Ibnu Ḥajar al-Asqalanīy, Fatḥ al-Barri, (Beirut: Dār al-Ma’rifah, 1379 H), 12/201.

Ibnu Hisyām, Op. Cit, h. 410, Lihat juga: Aḥmad bin Yahya al-Balażurī, Op. Cit, h. 1

Ibnu Hisyām, Sīrah an-Nabawiyyah, (Beirut: Maktabah al-‘Ilmiyyah, tt) 2/293.

Jalaluddīn al-Suyūṭī, al-Dibaj Fi Syarḥ al-Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjaj, (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, tt), 3/452.

Jamal al-Dīn Muḥammad al-Zailā‘ī, Naṣbu Rayah, (Beirut: Dar Muasasah al-Royan, 1997 M), 3/335

Muḥammad al-Rāzī, Mafātiḥ al-Ghāib, (Bairut: Dār al-Fikr, tth.), 8/225

Muhammad al-Ṭahir ibn ‘Asyūr, al-Taḥrir wa al-Tanwir, (Tunisia: Dār Sahnun, 1997 M), 2/275-277,

Muhammad al-Rāzī, Mafātiḥ al-Ghāib, (Bairut: Dār al-Fikr, tth.), 7/225

Muḥammad bin Aḥmad bin ‘Umar al-Syaṭiri, Syarh al-Yaqūt al-Nafīs, (Beirut: Dār al-Minhāj, 2011 M), 770

Muhammad bin Yusuf Abu Hayyan al-Andalusī, Tafsīr al-Bahr al-Muḥīṭ, (Bairut: Dār al-Kutūb al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1422 H), 2/130.

Muhammad Sa’īd Ramaḍan al-Buṭi, Ḥurriyah al-Insān fi Ẓīl al-Ubudiyyah (Beirut: Dār al-Fikr 1992M) 85.

Muhammad Sayyid Ṭanṭawī, al- Tafsīr Al-Wāsiṭ li al-Qur’an al-Karīm, (Kairo: Dār al-Ma’rifah, 1412 H), 1/447-448

Ramaḍan al-Buṭi, Huriyatul Insān Fī Ẓilli ‘Ubūdiyyah, (Beirut: Dār al-Fikr al-Mu’ashir 1992 M), 87

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. (Bandung: Alfabeta, 2013), h. 9

Suharsimi Arikunto, Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktis, Edisi Revisi, (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2013), h. 172.

Khatīb al-Syirbinī, Mughni al-Muhtāj, (Beirut: Dār al-Kutb Al-Ilmiyyah, 1994M), 5/427.

Syamsuddīn al-Żahabī, Mizan al-I‘tidal Fī Naqd al-Rijāl, (Beirut: Dār al-M’rifat, 1963 M), 93/3

Syamsuddīn al-Żahabi, Tażkirah al-Huffaẓ, (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1998 M) 74/1

Usāmah al-Sayyid al-Azharī, Asānid al-Misriyin, (Kairo: Dār al-Faqih, 2011), 539.

Wahbah Zuḥaili. Aṡār al-Ḥarbī. (Damaskus: Dār al-fikr, 2014 M),103

Wahbah Al-Zuhailī, al-Tafsīr al-Munīr, (Damaskus: Dar Al-Fikr, 1418 H), 3/23

Wizārah al-Auqaf Wa al-Syu’ūn al-Islāmiyyah Quwait, al-Mausuah al-Fiqhiyyah Quwaitiyyah (Quwait: Dār al-Salasil, 1427H), 22/182.

Ibn Nujaim al-Mishri, Bahr al-Rāiq Syarḥ Kanz al-Daqāiq (Beirut: Dār al-Kutb al-Islāmīy, tt), 5/129

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30