Implementasi Ḥudūd di Indonesia Menurut Abdullāh bin Bayyah

Muhammad Shidqi Wafa; Muhamad Saiq Hanani

doi:10.61570/syariah.v2i1.48

Authors

Muhammad Shidqi Wafa Ma'had Aly Lirboyo Kediri
Muhamad Saiq Hanani Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61570/syariah.v2i1.48

Keywords:

Ḥudūd, Abdullah bin Bayyah, Tanbīh al-Marāji’ Book

Abstract

The debate regarding ḥudūd creates differences in opinions among muslims. Some believe it is necessary to apply ḥudūd as an inseparable part of Shari'a without considering the context. Others argue that this concept needs to be reinterpreted according to current times. There are also moderate views that try to harmonize the two perspectives, including the view of Abdullāh bin Bayyah, who emphasizes harmonization between text and context to achieve a balanced understanding. Therefore, this research aims to analyze Abdullāh bin Bayyah's views on ḥudūd and the relevance of his views to criminal law in Indonesia. To achieve these objectives, the method used in the research is content analysis, which is classified as a qualitative method whose analysis is descriptive. Abdullāh bin Bayyah saw ḥudūd as part of Allah's noble law to prevent evil. ḥudūd punishment is considered superior in handling serious crimes. However, its implementation involves a serious evaluation of legal aspects such as causes, conditions, and māni' (hindrances). Before applying ḥudūd, it is necessary to tahqīq al-manāṭ to understand its consequences. Abdullāh bin Bayyah's view has relevance to criminal law in Indonesia, his view gives legitimacy to the Criminal Code as long as the risk of mafsadah enforcing ḥudūd is greater than not enforcing it. Even though ḥudūd has not been implemented in Indonesia, this view does not eliminate the possibility that the government and legislators continue to be responsible for understanding and analyzing reality according to current developments.

References

Abdillah, Junaidi. “Diskursus Hudûd Dalam Studi Hukum Islam (Melacak Evolusi Rumusan Hudûd).” AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial 13, no. 2 (December 31, 2018): 334–63. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v13i2.1881.

Awdah, Abdul Qadir. Al-Tasyrī‘ al-Jinā’i Muqaranan Bi al-Qānūn al-Waḍ‘i. Vol. 1. Beirut-Lebanon: Dar ar-Risalah al-Muassasah, 1996.

Bachri, Bachtiar S. “Meyakinkan Validitas Data Melalui Triangulasi Pada Penelitian Kualitatif.” Teknologi Pendidikan 10, no. 1 (April 1, 2010): 46–62.

Bayyah, Abdullah bin. Tanbīh Al-Marāji‘ ‘Alā Ta’Ṣīl Fiqh al-Wāqi‘. Dubai: Al-Muwatta Center, 2018.

Hadi, Sutrisno. Metodologi Research. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Penerbit Fakultas Psikologi UGM, 1989.

Hannani, Hannani. “EKSEKUSI MATI DI INDONESIA (Perspektif Teori Hudud Muhammad Syahrur).” DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum 15, no. 1 (June 12, 2017): 94–108. https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v15i1.428.

Hosen, Ibrahim. Pembaruan Hukum Islam Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Putra Harapan, 1990.

Jauzi, Ibn al-Qayyim al-. I‘lām al-Muwaqqi‘īn ‘an Rabb al-‘Ālamīn. Vol. 3. Beirut-Lebanon: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiah, 1991.

Jum‘ah, Ali. Al-Bayān Li Mā Yasyghalu al-Ażhān. Vol. 1. Kairo: Dar al-Muqaththam, 2014.

Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence. 2nd revised ed. Petaling Jaya: Ilmiah Pub., 2000.

mungkinkah-syariat-islam-diterapkan-di-indonesia. “Https://Www.Qureta.Com/Post/Mungkinkah-Syariat-Islam-Diterapkan-Di-Indonesia,” n.d.

Najmudin, Deden, Januar Hukmawa Janatino, Meisa Sobariah, Ihsan Maulana, Imam Al Hafiz, and Elsya Alfirani. “Syubhat Dalam Pelaksanaan Hudud Menurut Muhammad Abu Zahrah.” Tashdiq: Jurnal Kajian Agama Dan Dakwah 1, no. 3 (December 24, 2023): 51–60.

Praja, Juhaya S. Teori Hukum dan Aplikasinya. 1st ed. Bandung: Pustaka Pelajar Offset, 2011.

Qurthubi, Abu Abdillah Muhammad al-. Al-Jami’ Li Ahkam al-Qur`an. Vol. 8. Beirut-Lebanon: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiah, 2001.

Rahman, Fazlur. “The Concept Of Ḥadd In Islamic Law.” Islamic Studies 4, no. 3 (September 1965): 237–51.

Rizkiya, Mihfa. “Pelaksanaan Hukuman Cambuk Di Tapaktuan Menurut Perspektif Fiqih Jinayah (Studi Komparatif).” Hikmah: Journal of Islamic Studies 12, no. 1 (August 14, 2020).

Salim, and Haidir. Penelitian Pendidikan: Metode, Pendekatan Dan Jenis. Edited by Ihsan Satria Azhar. 1st ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2019.

Sila, Muhammad Adlin. “Menantang Negara Sekuler: Upaya Islamisasi Hukum Di Indonesia.” Studia Islamika 16, no. 2 (January 1, 1970). https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v16i2.486.

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2018.

Sularno, Muhammad. “Syari’at Islam Dan Upaya Pembentukan Hukum Positif Di Indonesia.” Al-Mawarid: Jurnal Hukum Islam 16 (2016).

Sumardi, Dedy. “HUDÛD DAN HAM: ARTIKULASI PENGGOLONGAN HUDÛD ABDULLAHI AHMED AN-NA’IM.” MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 35, no. 2 (December 2, 2011). https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v35i2.149.

Tanukhi, Al-Muhsin bin Ali at-. Nisywār Al-Muhāḍarah Wa Akhbāru al-Mużākarah. Vol. 1. Beirut-Lebanon: Dār Ṡadir, 1995.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) Bab III, Pasal No. 9. Jakarta: DPR-RI, 1999.